The "health guru" author seems to be mixing up overall wellbeing with digestive health, and reiterates that exercise is bad. She also discounts any evolution of prehistoric man into today's whisky-drinker. Hmm, well looking around...
TreacleSponge wrote:Does anyone else think the health & whisky article (p.48 issue 68) is a bit bizarre? ...
Muskrat Portage wrote:TreacleSponge wrote:Does anyone else think the health & whisky article (p.48 issue 68) is a bit bizarre? ...
TS:
Now, how did you (and the others in the UK) get hold of Issue 68 when only Issue 67 is out on the website? I wonder how we can unlock the article? Hmmmmmmm?
Muskrat Portage
Muskrat Portage wrote:TS:
Now, how did you (and the others in the UK) get hold of Issue 68 when only Issue 67 is out on the website?
TreacleSponge wrote:Does anyone else think the health & whisky article (p.48 issue 68) is a bit bizarre? When it started I thought it'd be a tongue-in-cheek bit of light reading. It's based on the premise that Happiness = Good health, and Whisky = Happiness. Therefore Whisky = Good health. Then it turns into a pseudo-scientific piece of contradictory nonsense that seems to take itself seriously.
The "health guru" author seems to be mixing up overall wellbeing with digestive health, and reiterates that exercise is bad. She also discounts any evolution of prehistoric man into today's whisky-drinker. Hmm, well looking around...
Aww, you only get ONE free sample?TreacleSponge wrote:Muskrat Portage wrote:TS:
Now, how did you (and the others in the UK) get hold of Issue 68 when only Issue 67 is out on the website?
It's because Paragraph like us best. We always get it first, and sometimes they put in personalised letters asking after our families, or inviting us out to tastings round their house. I like it when they include those tickets for travel, accommodation and entrance fees to distillery tours. Oh and usually there's free samples attached to the cover too
TreacleSponge wrote:Muskrat Portage wrote:TS:
Now, how did you (and the others in the UK) get hold of Issue 68 when only Issue 67 is out on the website?
It's because Paragraph like us best. We always get it first, and sometimes they put in personalised letters asking after our families, or inviting us out to tastings round their house. I like it when they include those tickets for travel, accommodation and entrance fees to distillery tours. Oh and usually there's free samples attached to the cover too
Rob Allanson wrote:TreacleSponge wrote:Muskrat Portage wrote:TS:
Now, how did you (and the others in the UK) get hold of Issue 68 when only Issue 67 is out on the website?
It's because Paragraph like us best. We always get it first, and sometimes they put in personalised letters asking after our families, or inviting us out to tastings round their house. I like it when they include those tickets for travel, accommodation and entrance fees to distillery tours. Oh and usually there's free samples attached to the cover too
Actually Teacle I will be round to read issue 69 to you on New Years day to save you having to turn the pages - well we cannot have you wasting valuable drinking energy that way.
You meant, of course, mid febdreary.Di Blasi wrote:... and now we also have issue #69 to look forward to mid-January!
Rob, I am truly impressed to see the lengths that an energetic young editor will go, to please his regional subcribers. I can only look forward to the date when an international service is instituted. With that in mind I really should extend my subscription another 5 years...Robbie Allanson wrote:Actually Treacle, I will be round to read issue 69 to you on New Years day, to save you having to turn the pages - well, we cannot have you wasting valuable drinking energy that way.
Yeah. If you send it in now, Johnathan,you may get issue 68 before I do! And maybe, as the newest subscriber, Rob will come over and read the issue to you as well. To cut down on the impact reading has on your dramming time, of course.Di Blasi wrote:That's true Muskrat Portage, I'm still trying to get issue #68. Les's suggestion of a subscription is probably a good idea. If sent out promptly, it will probably get to me quick.
Muskrat Portage wrote:Yeah. If you send it in now, Johnathan,you may get issue 68 before I do! And maybe, as the newest subscriber, Rob will come over and read the issue to you as well. To cut down on the impact reading has on your dramming time, of course.Di Blasi wrote:That's true Muskrat Portage, I'm still trying to get issue #68. Les's suggestion of a subscription is probably a good idea. If sent out promptly, it will probably get to me quick.
Your health is of tantamount importance to WM and as drinking whisky is so healthy, we shouldn't let any minor inconvenience, like reading, hold us back from it.
Musky
LeoDLion wrote:There are several articles about drinking once a day is better than not drinking at all. That the alcohol is good for your heart and blood vessels. Then another article popped up that says drinking two drams a day is even better than one. Now they stop at two- who knows maybe more than two is even better but then thats promoting drinking too much.
Willie JJ wrote:LeoDLion wrote:There are several articles about drinking once a day is better than not drinking at all. That the alcohol is good for your heart and blood vessels. Then another article popped up that says drinking two drams a day is even better than one. Now they stop at two- who knows maybe more than two is even better but then thats promoting drinking too much.
I will experiment with more than two and let you know in a couple of decades (hopefully). If you don't hear from me again then best not to try it yourself.
LeoDLion wrote:I think theirs an unwritten conspiracy between people in the medical profession specially doctors - that anything that makes you feel good they labelled it BAD for you. Doctors have never never recommended anything that makes you feel good or taste good.
les taylor wrote:I love brocolli. So much so that before steaming it I sometimes eat a bit raw. Top stuff.
les taylor wrote:Rob what do us old stalwarts get?