
lawschooldrunk wrote:just the 39 whiskies tasted and the rare bourbon pics are enough to make we want to read it, besides the friggin 6.99 price
les taylor wrote:You guys are so fortunate staying at home today. Some of us had to go out before Dave the postie arrived with the post. Or we went to Whisky Live London and picked up our complimentary issue there. The things we have to do A. By the way I've posted this before Matt and Paul A Jellis.
Paul A Jellis wrote:les taylor wrote:You guys are so fortunate staying at home today. Some of us had to go out before Dave the postie arrived with the post. Or we went to Whisky Live London and picked up our complimentary issue there. The things we have to do A. By the way I've posted this before Matt and Paul A Jellis.
That's because it was nearly midnight before I got home!
butephoto wrote:I saw it in Borders through the window when I was passing this morning. Unfortunately that was before they opened.
![]()
Do you think they would've minded if I'd smashed the window and left the money for the mag on the counter?
les taylor wrote:Paul A Jellis wrote:les taylor wrote:You guys are so fortunate staying at home today. Some of us had to go out before Dave the postie arrived with the post. Or we went to Whisky Live London and picked up our complimentary issue there. The things we have to do A. By the way I've posted this before Matt and Paul A Jellis.
That's because it was nearly midnight before I got home!
Thats what happens when you double book yourself.![]()
Paul how was your evening.
I know that's when they come out in Norfolk, howbeit may, I'm sitting here looking at Issue 69, (in my hand) which cover shows April 2008 and the picture of Issue 69 posted by Les clearly shows April 2008 as well. On a side note Issue 68 states March 2008.Willie JJ wrote:Issue 68 was January, issue 69 was February/March and issue 70 is April
Muskrat Portage wrote:So, Les, do I still have you going? Honest, this is the cover I'm looking at right now. I wonder why the variation?
I scanned it at 10% and it still comes out as a pretty big jpeg.
Peter
les taylor wrote:Muskrat Portage wrote:So, Les, do I still have you going? Honest, this is the cover I'm looking at right now. I wonder why the variation?
I scanned it at 10% and it still comes out as a pretty big jpeg.
Peter
Musky you are totally right. The UK edition of that mag has February/March 2008 on it.
Where that leaves us I don't know. Perhaps a letter to the editor might give the answer. You never know your letter might get published and you get a bottle of SM for your trouble.
butephoto wrote:les taylor wrote:Muskrat Portage wrote:So, Les, do I still have you going? Honest, this is the cover I'm looking at right now. I wonder why the variation?
I scanned it at 10% and it still comes out as a pretty big jpeg.
Peter
Musky you are totally right. The UK edition of that mag has February/March 2008 on it.
Where that leaves us I don't know. Perhaps a letter to the editor might give the answer. You never know your letter might get published and you get a bottle of SM for your trouble.
They're currently dishing out blends I think for that.