Willie JJ wrote:You would think they would make an effort to get them to the Chief Article early...
Anster wrote:Nae sign of mine either. Oh well. What does it say about the next Committee release?
Anster wrote:ah, I see.....as long as it's of a sufficient age to stand up by itself, is at cask strength, isn't finished in anything obscure, hasn't got seaweed floating in it, and is selling for under £60, I'll be happy. But, these days, who knows: if the LVMH PR folk can't be arsed to make sure the Chief Article gets a heads up before the general mail shot, what hope is there that they'll playing to the crowd that actually drink their whisky rather than dumping it on ebay before it arrives in the post?
Willie JJ wrote:Anster wrote:ah, I see.....as long as it's of a sufficient age to stand up by itself, is at cask strength, isn't finished in anything obscure, hasn't got seaweed floating in it, and is selling for under £60, I'll be happy. But, these days, who knows: if the LVMH PR folk can't be arsed to make sure the Chief Article gets a heads up before the general mail shot, what hope is there that they'll playing to the crowd that actually drink their whisky rather than dumping it on ebay before it arrives in the post?
I sense an element of cynicism
Alzarius wrote:Do US members get access to Committee bottlings?