WORKERS at Campbelt[url]own's fa[/url]mous Springbank Distillery will find out what the future holds for them today (Friday) after being told that the business is looking for voluntary redundancies in its production department.
The Courier has been told by workers at Springbank that a minimum of seven employees at the distillery are to be paid off. The option of voluntary redundancy has been made by letter to staff and those willing to accept were invited to apply by Monday of this week.
The Courier understands that Springbank is looking to stop production for two years; a situation that has happened before in the distillery's history.
sievm wrote:I hope that this doesn't lead to a longer term issue with the future of Springbank. The implications are that it might.
azazel wrote:I'd imagine that if they can calculate roughly how much it's going to cost to make whisky with some confidence, they'll be able to adjust their prices and spending accordingly.
Nick Brown wrote:sievm wrote:I hope that this doesn't lead to a longer term issue with the future of Springbank. The implications are that it might.
Indeed. Shutting down all production for at least two years is not a move made by a successful company. That's a move borne of desperation.
Nick Brown wrote:azazel wrote:I'd imagine that if they can calculate roughly how much it's going to cost to make whisky with some confidence, they'll be able to adjust their prices and spending accordingly.
I doubt that it's to do with the price of oil and barley. It's most likely about cashflow. The company must be stretched by the production costs of both Springbank and Glengyle, whilst the stock they hold is relatively young and will only be able to be sold at quite modest prices. It would be different if they had a stock of 25yo to knock out at superpremium prices, but they don't. Perhaps they had budgeted on a very tight cash flow anyway and the marginal increase in production costs means that it has gone beyond the level that could be supported by sale of their 10yo. But shutting down production gives them breathing space now, but will cause a problem 10 years down the line (if they get that far) where they have no stock to sell but production costs to meet.
azazel wrote:Without knowing the details of the company's finances it's nothing more than wild speculation to suggest it's a cashflow problem. ... When I was at the distillery earlier this year they said that production costs had almost DOUBLED in the space of a year. That a bit more than a marginal increase in anyone's book.
azazel wrote:Nick Brown wrote:sievm wrote:I hope that this doesn't lead to a longer term issue with the future of Springbank. The implications are that it might.
Indeed. Shutting down all production for at least two years is not a move made by a successful company. That's a move borne of desperation.
Where does it say that they're "shutting down all production for at least two years"?Nick Brown wrote:azazel wrote:I'd imagine that if they can calculate roughly how much it's going to cost to make whisky with some confidence, they'll be able to adjust their prices and spending accordingly.
I doubt that it's to do with the price of oil and barley. It's most likely about cashflow. The company must be stretched by the production costs of both Springbank and Glengyle, whilst the stock they hold is relatively young and will only be able to be sold at quite modest prices. It would be different if they had a stock of 25yo to knock out at superpremium prices, but they don't. Perhaps they had budgeted on a very tight cash flow anyway and the marginal increase in production costs means that it has gone beyond the level that could be supported by sale of their 10yo. But shutting down production gives them breathing space now, but will cause a problem 10 years down the line (if they get that far) where they have no stock to sell but production costs to meet.
Without knowing the details of the company's finances it's nothing more than wild speculation to suggest it's a cashflow problem. I'd suggest that the guy who owns Springbank has been around long enough to know how best to run his business, which, don't forget, is run unlike any other whisky company in the world. When I was at the distillery earlier this year they said that production costs had almost DOUBLED in the space of a year. That a bit more than a marginal increase in anyone's book.

Spirit of Islay wrote:
Don't Panic !
![]()
![]()
Sorry couldn't resist.....

orangedogofglory wrote:Since these guys shouldn't be operating on commodity margins (think timber product companies), they should be able to comfortably weather the storm while operating.
Crieftan wrote:Two weeks - not a planned 6 months or 2 years. The Islay boys stopped producing because they had no choice - and I bet they weren't happy about it.
The Springbank situation seems to be an entirely different matter.