lohssanami wrote:My friends in-laws, who are very nice folks, are fairly religious. They know that we have drinks often, and they don't really have anything against it.
However, I heard they were travelling through Europe, and I asked my friend's wife (daughter of those in-laws) if they would pick something up in Duty Free, and she said ABSOLUTELY NOT. She said she wouldn't even ask as they would never have any alcohol in their possession. So I guess this is an objection...hehe.
borgom wrote:It would be un-Australian to not drink!
Jimmy321 wrote:I voted never, i don't do religion and my family and friends know this.
blacksabb wrote:If you're not religious, would you pick up a religious item on your travels for someone?
blacksabb wrote:Now, the question is whether you or I would be willing to pick up something for those religious people on our travels? Let's say you went to Egypt and there was a book or video or something religious in nature at some religious store that was only avaliable in Egypt. Would you pick it up for them?
It would be un-Australian to not drink!
Liechtenstein wrote:
I am what most people would consider a religious fundamentalist but I would never call myself that. A distinction has to be made between faith and religion, as they are quite different one from the other:
As someone who has studied the Bible extensively, I can affirm that God hates religion with a passion! So, while I understand that religious people may hate alcohol and see it as demon drink, they are only expressing the all-too-human tendency to puff oneself up in order to lord it over others. Indeed, this is the domain of human religion not of biblical faith.
Swedish Chef wrote:I voted "Never experienced any religious objections to whisky drinking/collection". And yes, as long as it wouldn't get me into trouble with customs I'd pick up religious stuff as long as it wasn't for some Jihadist/Crusaders.
blacksabb wrote:I must confess that I've heard this many times. That faith and religion are separate. And that faith is of God and religion is of man.But I'm not entirely convinced.
blacksabb wrote: Faith inevitably leads to religion in my experience. The two are inseparable.
Iain wrote:"Give strong drink unto him that is ready to perish, and wine unto those that be of heavy hearts. Let him drink, and forget his poverty, and remember his misery no more. " Proverbs 31:6-9
I've a heavy heart and feel ready to perish, so it's going to be a long night following scripture...
borgom wrote:It would be un-Australian to not drink!
blacksabb wrote:Liechtenstein wrote:
I am what most people would consider a religious fundamentalist but I would never call myself that. A distinction has to be made between faith and religion, as they are quite different one from the other:
As someone who has studied the Bible extensively, I can affirm that God hates religion with a passion! So, while I understand that religious people may hate alcohol and see it as demon drink, they are only expressing the all-too-human tendency to puff oneself up in order to lord it over others. Indeed, this is the domain of human religion not of biblical faith.
I must confess that I've heard this many times. That faith and religion are separate. And that faith is of God and religion is of man.
But I'm not entirely convinced. Faith inevitably leads to religion in my experience. The two are inseparable.
RogerB wrote:I think a good Biblical analogy here would be the Pharisees, and their fixation on legalism/man made rules, and their heightened sense of self righteousness, while completely missing the point on how others should be treated.
Liechtenstein wrote: Some of the meanest, nastiest people I've met have been religious.
peat-chaser wrote:It would be un-Australian to not drink!
It would be un-bavarian not to drink
irishwhiskeychaser wrote:Similar in Ireland ...
It would be a slur against God, heaven and earth not to drink
pkt77242 wrote:I have heard many objections to my drinking whisky but none of them have ever been religious. The most common ones have been the cost of it and the effect on my health. One of the more crazy ones was someone telling me that drinking whisky made me seem old and unhip.
Sean
Reggaeblues wrote: For those of puritanical nature who might take offense at the enjoyment of our beloved liquid gold, I say:
"Jesus did not turn wine into water..."
Reggaeblues wrote:the thought that that supreme being, whatever, whoever he she or it is, actually dwells within us is still hard for religion to take on board, it seems. Even tho' it's there in all "faiths."
Liechtenstein wrote:Reggaeblues wrote:the thought that that supreme being, whatever, whoever he she or it is, actually dwells within us is still hard for religion to take on board, it seems. Even tho' it's there in all "faiths."
Congratulations on your posts on this tread, Reggaeblues. I only take exception to the above paragraph for these reasons:
1. God identifies himself with the male principle, not the female. Calling God she is a New Age practice.
2. God «present in us» is specific to Christianity, through the indwelling of the holy spirit. Religions such as Islam, Bahai, Hinduism, Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormonism, Christian Science, Scientology, Wicca ad nauseum all have a god or gods which have limited interaction with its followers. Buddhism is a religion without a god.
3. Christianity as such is a relationship with God, not a religion.
And your nun friend was right when she said that religion was the biggest insult man has ever made to God. Smart lady.
Reggaeblues wrote:The Creator gave us the facility of humour too!
Reggaeblues wrote: To say "God identifies himself with the male principle..." is well, a very challengeable statement.
Reggaeblues wrote:But who are we to speak for God, and say what God identifies with?
Reggaeblues wrote:It is we who make it complicated.
Reggaeblues wrote:Let me ask you this. When you experience the pleasures of a new whisky, is that male or female? Is Love, Joy, Kindness, Peace etc(you got me quoting Galations here) male or female?
Reggaeblues wrote:"Buddhism is a religion without a God." Yes, I've heard that from a buddhists lips. But I quickly understood by her understanding and actions that for sure she lives by the PRINCIPLES which characterise a "person of God." So really, these are , again, just our little verbal frames of reference...and make no difference to that Creator, surely?
Reggaeblues wrote:...and nice though Jehovah;s witnesses are, they believe they're going to live forever. When I ask if they know anyone in their ranks older than 100 they have no answer!