johan brugge wrote:My wife got me a Caol Ila 18 (and a Bowmore 17) for our wedding anniversary 2 years ago. I liked it but I was not very fond of the citrus notes in the Caol Ila. I never bought a second bottle. I liked the Bowmore much better.
Yello to Mello wrote:I love 18 year olds! Its such a ripe age!
MoreDalmore wrote:Thank you for the replies so far and the suggestions made!
The Yamazaki is on my wishlist already but it is out of my price range ( so is the Springbank ).
After reading tasting notes for the Port Askaig 17 I got interested in that one. That being from Caol Ila how does that compare to Caol Ila 18?
I also saw that Dalmore just released an 18 year old; I hope that fits my price range!!
MoreDalmore wrote:There seems to be not much love for the Bowmore which makes we wonder how many of you tasted it.
MoreDalmore wrote:There seems to be not much love for the Bowmore which makes we wonder how many of you tasted it.
The Third Dram wrote:I will say, however, that my [Bowmore] 18-year old appears to have 'come together' somewhat since the bottle was first opened. I see it as an excellent whisky overall.
johan brugge wrote:Why not a Yamazaki 18yo? Full of flavour.
Willie JJ wrote:This is a real ding-dong battle between the two front runners. It is suroprising that the others haven't really entered into the fray because they are all fine malts.