Not a member? - Register and login now.
All registered users can read our entire magazine archive.

Comparing Independant Bottlers.

Take part in our whisky polls and votes. You can also post your own polls in this forum.

Best independant bottler

I. Macleod (Dun Bheagan & Cheiften)
1
3%
D. Laing (Provenance & OMC)
9
24%
Signatory Vintages
4
11%
Duncan Taylor
3
8%
Gordon & McPhail
4
11%
Blackadder
0
No votes
Adalphi
2
5%
Murray McDavid
1
3%
James McAurther
0
No votes
Supermarkets (for value)
0
No votes
Other
3
8%
Cadenhead
7
19%
Hart Brothers
3
8%
 
Total votes : 37

Postby Bullie » Sun Dec 18, 2005 7:56 pm

I voted Gordon & MacPhail, for several reasons.

Most of all, they're one of the pioneers in bottling and selling single malt whisky. As early as 1914, they exported malt whisky.

The range and the high quality are two other reasons.
Without them, we wouldn't have 50 and 60 yrs old Glen Grants.
Bullie
Gold Member
 
Posts: 638
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 1:47 pm

Postby Frodo » Mon Jun 19, 2006 4:36 pm

I know it's been a while for this thread, but something occured to me. I was listening to a whisky podcast and heard John Hansell (editor Malt Advocate) talk about IB's and ones he'd recommend were the McKillop's Choice and Murray McDavid ranges. Interesting...
Frodo
Triple Gold Member
 
Posts: 2472
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 2:22 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Postby hpulley » Mon Jun 19, 2006 4:57 pm

MacKillop's Choice hasn't graced the shelves of the LCBO for many years. I contacted them about it but their story is the usual one: they'd love to have their stuff on the LCBO's shelves but have not been able to get them on there.

Murray McDavid used to have a good presence on our shelves but they and Bruichladdich (same owners) are just selling old stock right now for the most part. Only Bruichladdich 10yo and 14yo are general offerings. I've enjoyed most of the Murray McDavids I've had though Mark Reynier seems too infatuated with wine finishes at the moment, IMO.

Harry
hpulley
Triple Gold Member
 
Posts: 2503
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2002 2:01 am
Location: Guelph, Ontario, Canada

Postby irishwhiskeychaser » Mon Jun 19, 2006 6:07 pm

I have to say Cadenhead with Signatory second and only because I have the most experience with those two, so not very definitive.
User avatar
irishwhiskeychaser
Cask Strength Gold Member
 
Posts: 3644
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:27 pm
Location: Galway, Ireland

Postby Virginia Gentleman » Mon Jun 19, 2006 11:16 pm

I have not had too much experience with independant bottlers. The few malts I have had from Old Malt Cask were very good. The best being the 15 year old Laphroaig.
Virginia Gentleman
Silver Member
 
Posts: 309
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 12:28 am
Location: United States

Provincial Government bootlegger

Postby Muskrat Portage » Tue Jun 20, 2006 12:08 am

hpulley wrote:MacKillop's Choice hasn't graced the shelves of the LCBO for many years. I contacted them about it but their story is the usual one: they'd love to have their stuff on the LCBO's shelves but have not been able to get them on there...Harry

Like C_I, I have a large number of Signatory bottlings presumably because they can provide the quantities that the LCBO demands before they will stock any product. My collecting is pretty much limited to what the LC will import into the province.

I'm advised that the LCBO is the worlds' largest seller of alcohol (that should cause some comments)! :shock: It's not so hard to believe, as every single town or village in Ontario has at least one outlet and there are even Agency stores (attached to mom and pop grocery stores) in most hamlets. We are a small city and have 2 main stores, 2 satellites of the bigger stores and 1 agency store in our cachement area.

The Liquor Control Board can demand from the producers a set amount of product, (so the LC will be able to provide the selection in all of their outlets) and then negotiate producers to as low a price as they can get. By extension then, should a producer be unable to provide sufficient stock or the right price, they wouldn't be carried, thereby losing access to a very large, lucrative market. This may be the case with some products we never see. :D
Muskrat Portage
User avatar
Muskrat Portage
Triple Gold Member
 
Posts: 2384
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 12:47 am
Location: Jan says the North Pole, Ontario, Canada

Postby Di Blasi » Tue Jun 20, 2006 12:41 am

I must say the Douglas Laing brothers, as it's their bottlings I've mostly experienced and enjoyed. I also appreciate their philosophy, experience, honesty, and variety.
Di Blasi
Cask Strength Gold Member
 
Posts: 3741
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 11:16 pm
Location: Brussels, Belgium

Postby Frodo » Tue Jun 20, 2006 3:04 am

Great points CI!
Frodo
Triple Gold Member
 
Posts: 2472
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 2:22 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Postby Deactivated Member » Tue Jun 20, 2006 9:25 am

I agree that DL are pretty good and also consistent, but my vote goes to Hart Brothers.
Everything I have tried from them has been good.

MT
Deactivated Member
 

Postby scoobypl » Fri Jun 23, 2006 4:45 pm

OK, I'm a little ashamed that I've had numerous encounters with all of the named IB's :wink: And I have to say that there are a couple who don't give each other much lee-way... :wink:

First of all, I collect whisky for drinking, and, I am fond of the most honest and pure way of presenting whisky...which is single cask undiluted, unchillfiltered... so, I am almost obliged to turn my eye to the IB's, because, in all honesty, they are the only ones to bring me 'my kind' of whisky at more or less affordable prices! Most OB's that fit in my alley fetch ridiculous prices these days!

My favourite IB's are all of the above! Quite simply, because they all had absolute stunners and absolute monsters, and that is only natural! If and when you bottle a single cask, you are always gonna find people who love the stuff, and others who hate it... Most of the bigger IB's though, bottle pretty decent stuff for most of the time, and damn excellent stuff for some of the time. Price versus quality (meaning here: what I liked :wink: ) is what makes a great IB... anything above 160-170£ is to expensive in my book, and troubles the view a bit

- DL brings a lot of first notch stuff, and a lot off stunners... but lately I feel that they surf the waves of the high prices a bit to much (who can blame them) so I'm sorry Susan...a lot of the real good stuff becomes a bit pricey (Platinum and OMC) ... :(
- DT has some absolute stunners in their Peerless range, at a more or less affordable price, but they to, begin to ask premium prices...
- Signatory used to bring some very very , very good stuff...whisky to dribble over!... they lost the plot a bit between (rougly) 99 and 2004 with good but far from extraordinairy stuff... lately I think they are on the up, again... prices sometimes OK, sometimes way to high (Susan, instead of a drive in my Impreza, I'll have to let you taste some good Signatory to change your mind!...if you want to! :wink: )
- G&M: are absolutely champion at both ends of the scale! They have some absolute stunners for very reasonable prices (1965Glenlivet, 1958 Glen Grant, 1957 Glen Grant, 1960 Strathisla, aso, come to mind, all in the pricebrackett of 100-160£) in their 'OB'-range (40%ABV, but stunning nevertheless)... The CC-series has some very good value for money bottlings at 46% and a lot of decidedly unimpressive stuff at 40%...their best offerings at modest prices come from their "Reserve" series (prices 30-70£, most at cask strength, from 10 tot 35yo)
- Cadenhead's is very good nowadays, with a lot of value for little money, but they to had some decidedly dodgy bottlings between rougly 99-04)... they have one big bonus though: stunning single cask bourbons, rums and cognacs!
- Murray McDavid: the 'normal' series was very good indeed in the early years (some Springers and Macca's come to mind) ...now they have a dragon with the "maverick" series :evil: ... and the Mission is Brilliant, but sometimes a wee bit Dear.... :roll:
- Blackadder has some good quality stuff, but is rather expensive...and That 'Raw Cask'-theme, although with a lot of good whisky, is a Marketing gimmick if I ever saw one! 8)
- Hart Brothers is OK, I've tasted some stunners, but I also have a couple of "wish I hadn't opened this one' in my collection. They tended to bottle at to low a strength as well (40-43%)
- James McArthur: His series 500 years of whisky 1494-1994 produced some gems...lately I lost track of his bottlings so can't comment on them...
- Adelphi has done some very good HP's and Glen Grant's, no experience with the rest...

So, all in all, I have the feeling that the big 4 (G&m, Cadenhead's, DL and Signatory) or maybe 5 (+ DT) still do the best Job!!

My 2P,

Paul
PS1. Mind you: all of the above is just my opinion...
PS.2 Come to think of it: another qualification is the one: What IB has the nicest representative... and in that category DL wins 'hands down'... Suzywong :lol: although Mark (Watt) gets a vote of sympathy to! :twisted: :wink: :lol:
scoobypl
New member
 
Posts: 74
Joined: Thu Jun 22, 2006 9:26 am
Location: Belgium

Postby irishwhiskeychaser » Fri Jun 23, 2006 5:11 pm

Excellent post scoobypl... for us who don't have too much of an oppertunity to veiw these in our local off licence it makes it a bit of a leap in the dark. Therefore I tend to stay away but I may start venturing after that glowing report.
User avatar
irishwhiskeychaser
Cask Strength Gold Member
 
Posts: 3644
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 9:27 pm
Location: Galway, Ireland

Postby BigMac » Mon Jul 10, 2006 11:03 pm

Cadenhead is clearly in the lead here for me, with DL OMC&Platinum a strong second :D

Never had a bad Cadenhead yet, but have experienced at couple of 'misfires' from the OMC range

Also enjoying Blackadder and Duncan Taylor is certainly starting to climb the ranks

Regards,

Claus
BigMac
New member
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 5:24 pm
Location: Denmark

Previous

Return to Whisky Poll

Whisky gift and present finder