maverick wrote:Makes you wonder doesn't it? I once saw this inteview with the owner of a beer company and he got to test his own brew and he couldn't even tell the difference. I think that it depends on what you drink. Maybe the ones that are really up there in price don't differ too much from one another but if you compare a cheap one and an expensive one I bet you taste the difference. I love Danzka Grapefruite and there is nothing like it, atleast nothing that I have tried
So, is there any point in buying expensive vodkas?
Marvin wrote:Surely vodka made from grapes isnt really vodka?
irishwhiskeychaser wrote:Seemingly the better the vodka the less the taste, figure that our?????
Thesh wrote:irishwhiskeychaser wrote:Seemingly the better the vodka the less the taste, figure that our?????
Well, when I drink a richly flavored vodka, I have to eat lutfisk to kill the taste. I think this is the reason Nordic's invented lutfisk. They made a huge trade with someone in eastern europe for a large quantity of Vodka to keep them warm in the winter, but they were unable to consume it and in desperation soaked code in lye, which is slightly more pleasant than vodka.
Thesh wrote:Mr Fjeld wrote:I'm surprised you eat this in California - how come Thesh?
My grandfather's Norwegian; he took me and my brother to a lutefisk dinner a couple of times.
Andrew_Toronto wrote:while not as complex as Scotch (or any coloured liqour really) , vodkas differ greatly. (even bottled waters differ)
ex.
grey goose: smooth, sweet & clean.
absolut: sharp & bitter; rubbing alcohol with a great ad campaign.
Marvin wrote:Andrew_Toronto wrote:while not as complex as Scotch (or any coloured liqour really) , vodkas differ greatly. (even bottled waters differ)
ex.
grey goose: smooth, sweet & clean.
absolut: sharp & bitter; rubbing alcohol with a great ad campaign.
But how do you explain the test outlined in the original post?
MrTattieHeid wrote:I didn't vote because there isn't a "Who cares?" option.