Aidan wrote:I like Ardbeg, but I can't afford the gloves that are required to open a bottle.
Did anyone see the Ultimate Ardbeg Dinner on singlemalt tv? The bottle of Ardbeg in the glass case was opened with the gloves. I hope it was tongue in cheek.
Sure whisky just doesn't go with food like wine does. Nearly every chef will tell you that.
killerwhale wrote:.... unfortunately CI is not widely available here....
hpulley wrote:Aidan wrote:I like Ardbeg, but I can't afford the gloves that are required to open a bottle.
Did anyone see the Ultimate Ardbeg Dinner on singlemalt tv? The bottle of Ardbeg in the glass case was opened with the gloves. I hope it was tongue in cheek.
Sure whisky just doesn't go with food like wine does. Nearly every chef will tell you that.
Don't worry, I believe the gloves come with that particular bottle of Ardbeg so no need to pay extra for them
I take issue with your final line, however. Few chefs know anything thing about whisky (I don't believe many culinary schools mention it).
Harry
Aidan wrote:Another reason not to have whisky with food is that if gravy gets on those white gloves, they're ruined. And if the gloves are ruined, there's no way of pouring the whisky.
Aidan wrote:hpulley wrote:Aidan wrote:I like Ardbeg, but I can't afford the gloves that are required to open a bottle.
Did anyone see the Ultimate Ardbeg Dinner on singlemalt tv? The bottle of Ardbeg in the glass case was opened with the gloves. I hope it was tongue in cheek.
Sure whisky just doesn't go with food like wine does. Nearly every chef will tell you that.
Don't worry, I believe the gloves come with that particular bottle of Ardbeg so no need to pay extra for them
I take issue with your final line, however. Few chefs know anything thing about whisky (I don't believe many culinary schools mention it).
Harry
The few chefs that do know about whisky know it doesn't go with food. It may go well in some recipes, though. Some people just like whisky so much that they'd have it with anything. So chefs have to come up with the whisky-food combination that is most tolerable rather than on that is actually good. This is just my opinion, of course.
Another reason not to have whisky with food is that if gravy gets on those white gloves, they're ruined. And if the gloves are ruined, there's no way of pouring the whisky.
Aidan wrote:hpulley wrote:Aidan wrote:Sure whisky just doesn't go with food like wine does. Nearly every chef will tell you that.
I take issue with your final line, however. Few chefs know anything thing about whisky (I don't believe many culinary schools mention it).
Harry
The few chefs that do know about whisky know it doesn't go with food. It may go well in some recipes, though. Some people just like whisky so much that they'd have it with anything. So chefs have to come up with the whisky-food combination that is most tolerable rather than on that is actually good. This is just my opinion, of course.
peat-chaser wrote:@ Ganga:
Your quite right, there are perfect combinations of food and whisky, but not every one will match.
A few weeks ago I´ve been on a private tasting in Nijmegen (nederlands), theme was lost distilleries and every guest brought a bottle (23).
As a snack besides the drams there were plates with smoked salmon, bread and fudge. Well the fudge is too sweet, so in my opinion it matches with no whisky, bread is neutral so you can eat it with every whisky, interesting was the smoked salmon which was no good with a Coleburn G&M CC 1972 or a
Glenugie DT RoR 1981, but it was a perfect match with a Brora LMDW Sherry 1981 or a Port Ellen, The Bottlers, Ref Sherry 1982.
peat-chaser wrote:@ Ganga:
Your quite right, there are perfect combinations of food and whisky, but not every one will match.
A few weeks ago I´ve been on a private tasting in Nijmegen (nederlands), theme was lost distilleries and every guest brought a bottle (23).
As a snack besides the drams there were plates with smoked salmon, bread and fudge. Well the fudge is too sweet, so in my opinion it matches with no whisky, bread is neutral so you can eat it with every whisky, interesting was the smoked salmon which was no good with a Coleburn G&M CC 1972 or a
Glenugie DT RoR 1981, but it was a perfect match with a Brora LMDW Sherry 1981 or a Port Ellen, The Bottlers, Ref Sherry 1982.
hpulley wrote:Aidan wrote:hpulley wrote:Aidan wrote:Sure whisky just doesn't go with food like wine does. Nearly every chef will tell you that.
I take issue with your final line, however. Few chefs know anything thing about whisky (I don't believe many culinary schools mention it).
Harry
The few chefs that do know about whisky know it doesn't go with food. It may go well in some recipes, though. Some people just like whisky so much that they'd have it with anything. So chefs have to come up with the whisky-food combination that is most tolerable rather than on that is actually good. This is just my opinion, of course.
We'll simply have to agree to disagree here. I think some foods go marvelously with whisky, better than with wine, and not just because I prefer whisky overall. Just my opinion too of course.
Harry
MrTattieHeid wrote:Garrett Oliver says beer goes better with cheese than wine does. Of course, he makes beer. See here.
If beer, why not whisky? I admit I'm ambivalent at best. But as Joan Armatrading said, I am open to persuasion.
IainB wrote:MrTattieHeid wrote:Garrett Oliver says beer goes better with cheese than wine does. Of course, he makes beer. See here.
If beer, why not whisky? I admit I'm ambivalent at best. But as Joan Armatrading said, I am open to persuasion.
Well I agree that a good ale is great with cheese. As for the whisky, it depends very much on the whisky. Personally peat and cheese don't really go together but some unpeated whiskies are excellent with cheese. The ones I'd usually drink with cheese would be maybe Aberlour a'bunadh, a Balvenie port wood, Mortlach (only time I really drink it) or a good Irish with a some fortified wine cask involved, say Redbreast, Jameson 12yo or Bushmills or Tyrconnel madeira finish.