Matt Page wrote:Ok, I'm taking a break for a bit before we go for the Lap and Lag, need to refresh a bit (and pay someone a bit of attention). Will pop back in an hour or so, and hopefully some more people will turn up as a sensible hour reaches the rest of the world... maybe they are all hanging out in the 'other' place.![]()
Will probably revisit some of the above as well. Cheers everyone, good fun and be back soon.
Edit: Oh, welcome back K - maybe I should hang on in there till the end, back in 15 mins
Muskrat Portage wrote:Matt Page wrote:Ok, I'm taking a break for a bit before we go for the Lap and Lag, need to refresh a bit (and pay someone a bit of attention). Will pop back in an hour or so, and hopefully some more people will turn up as a sensible hour reaches the rest of the world... maybe they are all hanging out in the 'other' place.![]()
Will probably revisit some of the above as well. Cheers everyone, good fun and be back soon.
Edit: Oh, welcome back K - maybe I should hang on in there till the end, back in 15 mins
Oh, pour her another glass of wine, tell her you love her and then leap back into the fray.![]()
![]()
![]()
Musky
Matt Page wrote:Ok then, left her with my Connemara, won't see that again![]()
Still enjoying the Ardbeg and salmon, where are you upto K-Mile?
And yes, water is something I always add, really believe it can bring out alot in a good whisky.
K-Mile wrote: Good to see you still around. Just finished my notes on the 'Darkest', about to move on to the 'Dawn'.
Then it's Ardbeg (my first!) and Laga DE (also my first!)
Muskrat Portage wrote:K-Mile wrote: Good to see you still around. Just finished my notes on the 'Darkest', about to move on to the 'Dawn'.
Then it's Ardbeg (my first!) and Laga DE (also my first!)
Which Lagavulin DE do you own? Mine's and older 1979 edition at 43% abv. And it's poured...
Muskrat
Matt Page wrote:Looks like I will have to do the Laphroaig notes, oh what a shame..![]()
Laphroaig Quarter Cask
Nose : Peaty, oil, tar, tcp, with a gentle sweetness, slightly fishy?
Palate : Big creamy hit, with the obvious smoke, peat, tcp etc, again nice sweetness balances it
Finish : Long, ever lasting, bit harsh and dry
Comment : Always like Laph, and an interesting cask experiment, but I am left thinking...Why? The standard 10 year old offers all this and a bit more refined, maybe the QC is a bit dryer which isn't bad
Forums are not only for the expert whisky drinkers
Muskrat Portage wrote:Gentlemen, it's coming on 4:00 pm over here and I should have a quick nap before I kick in again at 2400 GMT. Morning came far too early and it's been a long day. Thank you to everyone who participated and especially to the visitors who watched from the sidelines. I look forward to hearing from you in the future.
Remember, the Forums are not only for the expert whisky drinkers but also for those of us who are still using training wheels. Nearly all of us are gradually learning ourselves and sound better in print (after we've had the opportunity to review, edit and mull over our postings) than we really are.
Again, thank you for now and we'll see you again in two hours.
Muskrat
Matt Page wrote:
Lagavulin 16 Year Old
Nose : Peat, smoke, etc, but with a deep rich sherry and fruit, big smack of oranges that I've never got before
Palate : Very gentle but full bodied, theres a real balance between the peat/smoke and fruity wood, something burnt but nice in the background
Finish : Dry, fruitiness goes to leave the smoke and peat, sea air and light salt
Comment : A fine example of classic Islay, seems that peat brings out the dry sherry/fruit
Malt-Teaser wrote:Hi everyone (anyone?), Malty's here now.
Firstly, I've had a quick peruse of this thread and my first comments are about the Bowmores:
I used the Dawn / Dusk / Darkest in a tasting last year and my recommendation would be to keep the Darkest until last!
It's definitely the strongest flavour (thanks to the sherry) and I fear the other two could be overpowered by it if drunk afterwards.
Anyway, as usual I will tend to do things my own way and a little differently.......![]()
I have brought two bottles to the table. They are both excellent drams which have very pleasantly surprised me over the last year or so.
1. Milford 10 from New Zealand
2. Glenfarclas 1987 "Quarter Casks"
Both have delicious colouring in the bottles. The Milford being the lighter of the two, but offering a lovely warming glow. The Glenfarclas is dark, rich and promises much.
Oh boy, I am going to enjoy these.
Anyway, who's around?
MT
Matt Page wrote:I think Muskys asleep in the corner, I'm staggering around in the car park, and K-Mile is propping up the bar wondering where everyone went....the party goes on regardless
Malt-Teaser wrote:I first discovered the Milford late last year when I put together an "international" whisky tasting, this was by far the great discovery and I distinctly remember a wonderful hint of banana when the bottle was first opened.
So, let's see if this one is the same .....
ohhhh YES!!!
Turn the screw top, open it gently with great anticipation of what will soon follow, stick the old (well, maybe not sooooo old) nostrils over the neck of the bottle and ........ there it is!
It's not quite banana, but the best way I can describe it is to liken it to when you pick up a bunch of bananas at the supermarket or fruit store and break a few off the bunch because you don't need them all. That one action gives off a distinct type of banana smell ....... that is what I get from the Milford, along with hints of toffee, or more accurately toffee apple ...... I remember now, this Milford reminds of childhood bonfire night (don't worry, this is an English thing). A cold evening, a big bonfire in the garden, toffee, toffee apples .... mmmmm .......... delicious and I haven't even poured it yet!
Malt-Teaser wrote:Hi K-Mile, glad to see still around and humouring Matt by laughing at his jokes.
Is that Musky I hear snoring over on the sofa?