Musky wrote:Talisker Distillers Edition TD-S:5 AM (1986) 45.8 abv
Nose : Oily, with a sea breeze thrown in, redolent of Jeraz Amoroso sherry, succulent aroma of cherries, with an undercurrent of Malt
Palate : Sweet, malty with a tinge of iodine, a hint of chocolate at the end
Finish : Long and warming, the mouth salivates at the after effect of the sherry and alcohol. Has a nice mouth prickle to it.
Comment : Mr Copland, you distilled a fine dram
Les Taylor wrote:Talisker Distillers TD-S:5HT 45.8abv. Distilled 1992 bottled 2005
NOSE Just slightly peaty and orangey
PALATE Sweet christmas pudding orange peel and peppery.
FINISH Dates and cinnamon. A very nice after taste that hangs there.
COMMENT Smooth the sherry comes through an excellent after dinner dram.
Ganga wrote:TD-S:5HT 1992 DE 45.8, glencairn
Nose : the sea is quite apparent. Is that hints of cocoa? Light orange peels.
Palate : Wow, smoked peat/seaweed. A little ripe oranges. A little bit oily on the palate.
Finish : Moderately long with smoke and seaweed returing.
Comment : This is a very nice expression from a wonderful distillery.
Mr Fjeld wrote:Talisker DE "Amoros wood"
Nose : Not as smoky as I had expected - not really that sweet either but a subtle sweetness resembling rose water. Faintly nutty
Palate : Oh, nice! Makes an impression and follows up as promised in the nose. Again, a subtle sweetness and something nutty, then smoke which clinges on to the sides of the mouth
Finish : Could perhaps be longer but not really disappointing
Comment : I really like it. Although it could have a longer lasting finish it's still mouthfilling and nice
Re: Talisker Distillers TD-S:5HT 45.8abv. Distilled 1992
Two identical whiskies tasted, with different perspectives on the flavours by Les and Ganga. Not dissimilar but neither do your tastes and experiences mirror each other. Puts a bit of a reality check on the notes published by experts. We all have our own strengths and weaknesses (anosmia, colds) to work within the only substative difference is the "experts" are better wordsmiths than we. Is this why we pay for them to write books that we can purchase, so we can develop understanding from their use of the written language.
Despite the intervening years, these DE are not all that disimilar. Tell me, Ganga, who was the master distiller for your bottle? Was it M. Copland? If not, then they were very similar in choices made for the DE.
Muskrat
And yes I have a dram of mine in hand as I keyboard! (a bit slower at typing tonight)
Edit: Ganga: Yes, I'm still here and what's next?