Novice Scotch Fan wrote:I had it five years ago and it was rough poison, and then I had it in May of this year bracing myself for the worst and to my surprise I enjoyed it. I am unsure if it has improved or my appreciation of scotch has, which was the contributing factor for enjoying it. Certainly five years ago i was not a scotch fan whereas today I am. unsure what to think but I will say now that I would not turn down JWR if offered to me. It is fashionable to bash this blend, but if people gave it a chance or tasted it blind they might form a different opinion.
tuddy24 wrote:It's really easy to bash anything popular.
lockejn wrote:but to even suggest putting it in the same class as Teacher's seems absurd.
lockejn wrote:So I've just opened a fresh bottle of Red. My previous impressions are consistent with what's in my glass. Good flavor profile, but watered down and spirity. It's not bad, but mediocre would be a fair assessment I think. I certainly have no qualms about drinking it, but I'd rather have (pay for) something else.
Maybe we get a different blend around these parts.
borgom wrote:lockejn wrote:but to even suggest putting it in the same class as Teacher's seems absurd.
Well it's a matter of taste really (and batch variation). My last bottle of JWR and Teachers were opened together. Now the JWR is long gone and the Teachers isn't even half gone. This bottle of Teachers is actually more spirity than the JWR was.
borgom wrote:I've had the same experience with JWR. A few years or more ago I remember it being harsh, spirity rubbish but recently the bottlings seem to be far more balanced. You can definately taste the Talisker/Caol Ila influence in it now, which is great. There might be some regional/batch variation but the general consensus seems to be that is has greatly improved of late. I'll have to do a retaste of JWB but from memory I also prefer Red over Black.
Reggaeblues wrote:I had this experience flying back to UK from Brisbane in October 2006. All they had on the plane was JW Red, so I figured I'd just have to make do...To my surprise, all I could taste was Talisker!
Reggaeblues wrote:Yes, L, as you say, you "...COULD get the same taste", but the drift of this thread is that the profile seems to change. Read your Bible and you'll know the truth! The 2006 edition review is a world apart( and 4 points!) from the one in 2009, in which the author, like me, was travelling by air - in a British Airways lounge to be precise - when he was stunned by an onslaught of peat in a JW Red, which he described as "the earthiest version ever!"
Reggaeblues wrote:Maybe they would...but JM was not at altitude-he was in the BA lounge at the airport!
Reggaeblues wrote:It occurs to me that in Jamaica "Red" means "stoned" as in "red-eye"...it may also mean "drunk", I'm not sure, but it puts a whole new spin on JWRed.
tuddy24 wrote:lockejn wrote:So I've just opened a fresh bottle of Red. My previous impressions are consistent with what's in my glass. Good flavor profile, but watered down and spirity. It's not bad, but mediocre would be a fair assessment I think. I certainly have no qualms about drinking it, but I'd rather have (pay for) something else.
Maybe we get a different blend around these parts.
lockejn,
I'll be purchasing a bottle of Red this weekend, Binny's has a 15% off sale, and I'll compare the "spiriti-ness" of Black, Red, and Famous Grouse. I left the Teacher's at my buddy's house for him to keep and personally I found it too peaty for me. I like when there is peat but there has to be smoke as well. The Teacher's didn't seem to have any smoke.
-Pete
Reggaeblues wrote:Mi sooner lick de Lambs Bread like Bob Marley! 'tis Murder also, but in a nice way!
Novice Scotch Fan wrote:I had Johnnie Red this past weekend at a wedding and was pleased. It was quite peaty, some smoke, and definitely sweet on the finish. There was no burn upon swallowing, but rather what I would call "warmth." The finish disappeared in the blink of an eye.
Liechtenstein wrote:I think it is a good beginner's whisky and perhaps some of the posters here have forgotten that. First you crawl, then you walk, then you run, then you drive.
ClubSmed wrote:I find that when going to somewhere to enjoy whisky first I drive (to get there) then I run inside the place to get started, walk around and talk to people whilst enjoying the whisky then crawl out to go home
![]()
![]()
Liechtenstein wrote:ClubSmed wrote:I find that when going to somewhere to enjoy whisky first I drive (to get there) then I run inside the place to get started, walk around and talk to people whilst enjoying the whisky then crawl out to go home
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
PS...I am actually considering purchasing a bottle of JWR. You guys are making it sound so delectable!
lockejn wrote:I'm sure we'd all appreciate your take on the subject.
Liechtenstein wrote:I'm still thinking about buying a JWR. My heart says It's just $25! but my head says Are you out of your mind?!
Liechtenstein wrote:That was really, really good, Reggae! Are you Jamaican?
I used to work with a Jamaican man and he could speak just the way you did (he also could speak plainly.)lockejn wrote:I'm sure we'd all appreciate your take on the subject.
I'm still thinking about buying a JWR. My heart says It's just $25! but my head says Are you out of your mind?!