Secesh wrote:I just opened a bottle of this a few minutes ago. I will say it is... different.
As soon as I took the top off I was hit with the strong smell of cider. The nose itself seemed to be charred wood, with not much else coming through. The palate was strong in apples and wood. Too much wood. The finish was over taken by alcohol. Nothing else was able to break through it. My guess is that this is a by product of it's very short maturation (4 months). Matured longer it would probably be a much better whisky. As is it's something that was worth a try but I won't be buying again. That's a shame because I think it has potential; it just needs time.
Leither wrote:LI - no, it's 4 months old according to the label and as such cannot legally be called whisky.
peat-chaser wrote:Excuse me, but that sounds rather weird, they call a 4 month matured freshmake whisky and it´s taste is loads of wood?
Seems to have "matured" in some composit vessels together with a ton of woodchips.
Did you read the backlabel? I´m sure there has to be a hint like "Don´t serve without plenty of ice and coke!!!"
Secesh wrote:peat-chaser wrote:Excuse me, but that sounds rather weird, they call a 4 month matured freshmake whisky and it´s taste is loads of wood?
Seems to have "matured" in some composit vessels together with a ton of woodchips.
Did you read the backlabel? I´m sure there has to be a hint like "Don´t serve without plenty of ice and coke!!!"
Yes, it is matured with a bunch of woodchips in the cask. It's supposed to help the whiskey mature faster.![]()
I applaud the attempt but shouldn't it be obvious that starting a small distillery from scratch required a bankroll in order to keep things going while the whiskey matures over several years, not months? Or am I just missing something since I'm new?
dcb wrote:I saw this bottle on the NH shelves a while back and it was expensive even for NH prices, which are generally excellent (I believe it was about $40). Couldn't bring my self to try it since it clearly stated 4 months old and I couldn't begin to imagine why it was bottled so young. I might have tried it if it was much cheaper, like $10-$15.
ryguy wrote:I tried this last night, and I posted my thoughts here.
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2193&p=171175#p171175
Thanks Secesh for the sample!
Eric m wrote:Now i`m curious aren`t there any miniatures of Washmunds or are there people like to swap?
Eric.
Eric m wrote:If i had a Lap 40 it wouldn`t be a problemounfortunately i haven`t but i can offer you a Laphroaig 8yo,a Dutch single malt,a vatted Islay or a Bunnahabain 10yo sherry finish at 46%abv.Pick one of these.
Eric.
UUNetBill wrote:I was just in a shop in New Jersey this past weekend and was shown a bottle of this by one of the employees, who was enamored of the spirit. I thought it sounded interesting, but having already seen their selection of IBs that I wanted to diminish by a bottle or three, I decided to pass on it. The rep at the store told me it was matured in heavily charred applewood barrels with applewood chips, therefore didn't need to be aged longer than the few months it was. Unfortunately, I'm a believer in the theory that you can't rush some things - whiskey included. I'd rather have then pass on the chips and wait a few years. I'd surely try it, but I don't know as I'd buy it. Not when there are so many other options in the bourbon/American range at a similar price point.
JMHO
Willie JJ wrote:Yes that was a lucky escape. I can't believe the guy really thinks it is good. I thought the Wasmund's was close to revolting and I struggled to finish the dram. (Those who know me understand the significance of this last bit.) Definitely be wary of the advise that he gives you in future.
Ryguy wrote:Willie JJ wrote:Yes that was a lucky escape. I can't believe the guy really thinks it is good. I thought the Wasmund's was close to revolting and I struggled to finish the dram. (Those who know me understand the significance of this last bit.) Definitely be wary of the advise that he gives you in future.
It was a bit strange, I do agree Willie. But you struggled to finish it??![]()
![]()
![]()
Even I didn't have trouble finishing the sample I had. Should I be concerned about this?
UUNetBill wrote: The rep at the store told me it was matured in heavily charred applewood barrels with applewood chips, therefore didn't need to be aged longer than the few months it was. Unfortunately, I'm a believer in the theory that you can't rush some things - whiskey included. I'd rather have then pass on the chips and wait a few years. I'd surely try it, but I don't know as I'd buy it. Not when there are so many other options in the bourbon/American range at a similar price point.
JMHO