Not a member? - Register and login now.
All registered users can read our entire magazine archive.

US Law requiring New Oak

All your whisky related questions answered here.

US Law requiring New Oak

Postby fwrightson » Tue Jul 31, 2012 2:33 am

Can anyone point me to when the US changed its law requiring American whisky to be aged in new oak?
User avatar
fwrightson
New member
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2011 11:48 pm
Location: Jupiter, FL

Re: US Law requiring New Oak

Postby AdamMY » Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:12 am

fwrightson wrote:Can anyone point me to when the US changed its law requiring American whisky to be aged in new oak?


That's not a requirement for American whiskey. Unless you mean Bourbon, which I do not know when the law was changed, I somehow believed when bourbon was created as a style that was considered a defining characteristic of the style.

America does have more styles of whiskey than just bourbon, and I believe most of them do not require that only new oak barrels are used. In fact I can think of at least one Distillery that produces both Bourbon, and what they call Kentucky Whiskey, the latter being in my understanding very similar to the first but is aged at least in part in refilled barrels. (That distillery is Early Times).
User avatar
AdamMY
Cask Strength Gold Member
 
Posts: 3951
Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 9:51 pm

Re: US Law requiring New Oak

Postby whiskgeek » Thu Aug 02, 2012 5:45 am

I believe that Bourbon and Tennessee Whiskey are the two forms of American whiskey that have a list of strict regulations. They both require aging in new, charred barrels, and have for quite some time, as far as I know.
User avatar
whiskgeek
Bronze Member
 
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 4:43 am
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Return to Questions & Answers

Whisky gift and present finder