Not a member? - Register and login now.
All registered users can read our entire magazine archive.

Novelty Finishes Poll

All your whisky related questions answered here.

Novelty Finishes Poll

Postby Ileach » Mon Apr 01, 2002 5:35 pm

You guys from whiskymag.com really know how to find out what whisky lovers all over the world think of recent developments in the whisky industry:

"Novelty finishes: a passing fad or here to stay?"

possible answers: yes / no / maybe.

So, if I choose "yes", do I say, "yes, they are a passing fad"? or "yes, they are here to stay"? or "yes, they are a passing fad OR here to stay"?

And, pardon my question, what meaning do you extract from the answer "maybe"?

"Maybe they're a passing fad or here to stay", "maybe they're neither a passing fad nor here to stay", et cetera, et cetera...


I bet the marketing departments of Glenmorangie or Springbank can't wait to see the results . . . Image

Ileach
Ileach
New member
 
Posts: 74
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2002 2:01 am
Location: Switzerland

Postby BruceCrichton » Mon Apr 01, 2002 6:55 pm

I hope it isn't a passing fad.

A couple of the big name blended whiskies are greatly improved by a new finish as a re a couple of big name malts. Other whiskies are a waste of money and time.

As always it depends on the whiskies and finishes involved.
BruceCrichton
Double Gold Member
 
Posts: 1274
Joined: Mon May 07, 2001 1:01 am
Location: Falkirk, Stirlingshire, United Kingdom

Postby Brigid » Tue Apr 02, 2002 8:55 am

Ileach,

Thanks for that...the poll is due for a change anyway!

Brigid
Brigid
New member
 
Posts: 32
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2001 1:01 am
Location: Norwich

Postby bartok » Thu Apr 11, 2002 3:53 am

The Balvenie12 doublewood is nice.Does anyone prefer the 10 without the finish?
bartok
New member
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 2:01 am
Location: madison,WI,usa

Postby hpulley » Thu Apr 11, 2002 11:29 am

I prefer the Doublewood highly over the 10yo. It is the only speyside I've liked enough to buy as of yet, but I'm still doing lots of experimenting at tasting parties.

Bowmore Darkest is my favorite Bowmore too. I enjoy regular and novelty finished whiskies and I hope distilleries will continue to produce both.
hpulley
Triple Gold Member
 
Posts: 2503
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2002 2:01 am
Location: Guelph, Ontario, Canada

Postby Deactivated Member » Thu Apr 11, 2002 2:56 pm

Ileach,

You make a good point here, it's not very much clear what to fill in, so that's why I didn't fill in anything at all.
I can't say that it's a passing fad, I think that there are lots of connoisseurs who loves a very good novelty finish, and I believe that as long as there's a high demand for it on the market, why stop? So MAYBE they are here to stay?, or if the producers decide otherwise, then it will be a NO and it is a passing fad?, or still YES because the financial figures seems to be OK?
It's difficult to fill in such a "Poll" with the only answers YES/NO/MAYBE...

Keep on Finishing,

Erik
Deactivated Member
 

Postby Ian_Hamilton » Fri Apr 12, 2002 9:00 pm

Hi
I think the novelty finishes are here to stay because there are loads of whisky lovers out there you want to try them, the poor ones will go but more will come in their place.
People who love a certain whisky will always want to try any finishes of that whisky!
Ian_Hamilton
Bronze Member
 
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Dumbarton

Postby bartok » Sat Apr 13, 2002 1:20 am

Hi Ian_Hamilton- I agree,I wish I could get those novelty finishes in the Classic Malt Line (Lagavulin and Talisker),but living in the USA I have never seen them.
bartok
New member
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2002 2:01 am
Location: madison,WI,usa

Postby hpulley » Sat Apr 13, 2002 12:22 pm

No Distiller's Edition Lagavulin Pedro Xemenez finished where you are? Would you make a road trip to Ontario for one? The LCBO has that one for just $5 CND more than Lagavulin 16.

[This message has been edited by hpulley (edited 13 April 2002).]
hpulley
Triple Gold Member
 
Posts: 2503
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2002 2:01 am
Location: Guelph, Ontario, Canada

Postby BruceCrichton » Sun Apr 14, 2002 11:03 pm

I much prefer the Balvenie 10 yr old to the 12. The 10 yr is like warm honey in a glass.

The 12 yr old is too clever for it's own good and works about as well as putting make-up on a swan.
BruceCrichton
Double Gold Member
 
Posts: 1274
Joined: Mon May 07, 2001 1:01 am
Location: Falkirk, Stirlingshire, United Kingdom

Preferred Glass Poll

Postby St.Peat » Fri Apr 26, 2002 4:20 am

Hello, all --

At the WOW Expo in San Francisco this March, I saw quite a few people toting and extolling the virtues of some rather cumbersome (500ml and larger!) snifters.

I was able to try one side-by-side with the Expo's default glass, a wine/water glass with a suitably shaped bowl. The difference was amazing!

Have you used one of these?

If so, please give reasons for liking or disliking this type of snifter for nosing whiskies, and whether you use this glass regularly.

If not, perhaps you will mention what you have used and liked best, as well as if you use a particular glass regularly.

St.Peat

PS -- I encourage all of you to at least try one of these -- you will notice a difference. Though, whether you like it or not may be another story! Image

[This message has been edited by St.Peat (edited 26 April 2002).]
St.Peat
Bronze Member
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2001 1:01 am
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

Postby hpulley » Fri Apr 26, 2002 12:41 pm

I haven't tried the exact glass you mention but my preferred glass is a large brandy snifter which could well hold 500mL (I'll have to check). The difference between the large snifter and small ones or standard bar whisky tumblers here in Canada is quite striking. The snifter really concentrates the vapours well, though for cheap whiskies with bad noses the tumbler is still best Image
hpulley
Triple Gold Member
 
Posts: 2503
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2002 2:01 am
Location: Guelph, Ontario, Canada

Postby BruceCrichton » Fri Apr 26, 2002 4:32 pm

I prefer the new tulip-shaped whisky glass which is shaped the same as a tasting glass but is made more solidly.

As for bad whiskies, why are you drinking, them? You can't tell a bad whisky until you taste one and you can't tell what it's like until you've drunk it out of a proper whisky glass to get the full flavour.
BruceCrichton
Double Gold Member
 
Posts: 1274
Joined: Mon May 07, 2001 1:01 am
Location: Falkirk, Stirlingshire, United Kingdom

Postby Ize » Mon Apr 29, 2002 5:24 am

I as well prefer tulip shaped glass, Lagavulin glass is a beauty. Image

[This message has been edited by Ize (edited 29 April 2002).]
Ize
Silver Member
 
Posts: 363
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2002 2:01 am
Location: Up north, Finland

Postby hpulley » Mon Apr 29, 2002 4:04 pm

Why drink a bad one at all? When you can't try it by the dram but want to try it so you buy a whole bottle. After a good number of drams, each time hoping the next will be better, there comes a point when it is just bad whisky. Few charities accept opened bottles...
hpulley
Triple Gold Member
 
Posts: 2503
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2002 2:01 am
Location: Guelph, Ontario, Canada

Postby Gate » Wed May 01, 2002 9:32 pm

I think the Riedel glass is probably my favourite - maybe something to do with the very fine rim. It might be interesting to experiment by tasting an old favourite from a series of different glasses - but sometimes how the glass feels when you're holding it is as important as anything. Every now and again the heavy cut glass tumbler just hits the spot - especially for Talisker. Is this heresy?
Gate
Silver Member
 
Posts: 305
Joined: Wed May 01, 2002 1:01 am
Location: UK

Postby Chris Brousseau » Mon May 06, 2002 8:20 pm

My favorite is the glass made by the Scotch Malt Whisky Society in Leith.

Chris
Chris Brousseau
New member
 
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2002 2:01 am
Location: Peterborough, Ontario, Canada

Postby Nodin » Tue May 07, 2002 9:36 pm

Hi all...I'm new here. My favorite glass is a tulip shaped crystal glass from Finland...directs the nose, feels good in the hand and looks damn nice!
I also really like the new Blender's Malt Glass (directs the nose like a chimney!)
Nodin
New member
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat May 04, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Duluth, Minnesota, USA

Postby Ize » Wed May 08, 2002 7:26 am

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Arial, Verdana">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Nodin:
<B>Hi all...I'm new here. My favorite glass is a tulip shaped crystal glass from Finland...directs the nose, feels good in the hand and looks damn nice!
I also really like the new Blender's Malt Glass (directs the nose like a chimney!)</B><HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Just curiosity, do you recall manufacturer's name (brand) of that glass? Iittala perhaps?
Ize
Silver Member
 
Posts: 363
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2002 2:01 am
Location: Up north, Finland

Postby Deactivated Member » Wed May 08, 2002 5:56 pm

Hi,

I prefer the tulip shaped glasses, simply because you'll get the whole benefit of aroma's.......

Slainte,

Erik
Deactivated Member
 

Postby jeremy p » Wed May 08, 2002 6:41 pm

I'm more than happy with the tasting glasses we got at last year's Whisky Live (not this year, though, as they'd run out by the time we came - shame!).

Alternatively, I enjoy drinking out of the Edinburgh Glass crystal tumblers we were given at Christmas. For some reason, the extra weight of the glass seems to add a certain gravitas to the dram itself.

And yes, I know it's only psychological...!
jeremy p
New member
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 2:01 am
Location: Bath

Postby Nodin » Thu May 09, 2002 7:54 pm

[QUOTE]Originally posted by Ize:
[B] Just curiosity, do you recall manufacturer's name (brand) of that glass? Iittala perhaps?

Yes, I beieve that is the maker...
Taa



[This message has been edited by Nodin (edited 09 May 2002).]
Nodin
New member
 
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat May 04, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Duluth, Minnesota, USA

Postby St.Peat » Mon May 13, 2002 9:02 am

Can some of you paste an image of the glass(es) you are speaking of?

I do not have a picture of the large snifter I mentioned, but imagine a standard snifter shape, and now imagine that it can hold nearly a full bottle of whisky. Image

Thanks for the images!
St.Peat
Bronze Member
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2001 1:01 am
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

Postby St.Peat » Mon May 13, 2002 9:45 am

Thanks, Ize --

Is this the kind of glass referred to as a sherry copita?

Occasionally I enjoy holding a glass by the stem, and this one looks long enough for that. Some stems are so short as to be nothing but a pain, or an unpleasant awkwardness.

Cheers!
St.Peat
Bronze Member
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2001 1:01 am
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

Postby St.Peat » Tue May 14, 2002 8:19 am

265 oz brandy snifter!

265 oz = 7840 ml = 7.84 L = 2.07 gal !!
http://www.steps-to-memories.com/gl-brandy-snifters.html
St.Peat
Bronze Member
 
Posts: 120
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2001 1:01 am
Location: San Francisco Bay Area

Postby Ize » Tue May 14, 2002 8:50 am

Heh, I guess that glass won't give anything else than scent from one dram. Of course, if your dram is very very big you might even got something to taste too. ;-)

[This message has been edited by Ize (edited 14 May 2002).]
Ize
Silver Member
 
Posts: 363
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2002 2:01 am
Location: Up north, Finland

Postby Gate » Wed Jun 19, 2002 5:29 pm

I have been as scientific as I ever get on a glass-by-glass test, and I have now concluded that Irish pot stills (Green Spot used for this), bourbon (Old Rip 15 y.o.), Lowland malts (Auchentoshan 10 y.o.) and lighter-bodied blends (J&B Ultima) are best from the Riedel whisky glass; anything big and peaty (Lagavulin PX finish, Talisker) worked best out of a Cadenheads thistle-shaped glass (I have seen identical Ardbeg ones); Speysiders (Macallan "Thirties", Balvenie 15 y.o. Single barrel) and non-peaty Highlanders (Glengoyne) were best from the "Whisky Live" glass. And for just sitting down and drinking whatever takes your fancy while watching the World Cup, the half-kilo lead crystal tumbler leaves all the rest eating dust. The conclusions hardly matter, though, because the research was such a pleasure I think I shall have to do it again.

[This message has been edited by Gate (edited 19 June 2002).]
Gate
Silver Member
 
Posts: 305
Joined: Wed May 01, 2002 1:01 am
Location: UK

Postby yorkie » Sun Jun 23, 2002 8:51 pm

I'm more than happy with the tasting glasses we got at last year's Whisky Live (not this year, though, as they'd run out by the time we came - shame!).

Alternatively, I enjoy drinking out of the Edinburgh Glass crystal tumblers we were given at Christmas. For some reason, the extra weight of the glass seems to add a certain gravitas to the dram itself.

And yes, I know it's only psychological...!
yorkie
New member
 
Posts: 44
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2001 1:01 am
Location: West Yorks

Postby blackkeno » Sat Jul 06, 2002 5:45 am

Over the past year, I've greatly expanded my glassware. I like to change glasses to get different experiences with the same whisky. I even do "glassware verticles" sometimes. I generally drink without ice. Contrary to preferring to spend my money on whisky (like most of you I spend plenty) I think great and diverse glassware is a small price to pay to experience a great whisky better or different. Here are my reviews of my favorates:

1) "The Blender's Malt Glass" by Glencairn Chrystal (mine are from Whisky Magazine). This is now my favorate glass. It's also a good value at 5 pounds for a chrystal glass. It is my favorate nosing glass. It seems to somehow stregthen some of the lighter notes without making the stronger ones overpowering. This provides me with a broader bouquet filled with distinct character. The palate experience would probably be my number two. It creates a broad taste that is probably enhanced by the nose. Handfeel is also great--confortable and firm.

2) Maison du whisky (medium size/very expensive). The best handfeel of any of these glasses. Especially confortable for a bourbon. Nose and palate rival the Blender's Malt Glass yet create a different experience. I also have the larger size, but the nose becomes a bit too intense for me. I do like it for lighter spirits though and for nosing at different distances.

3) Reidel Single Malt Glasses, hand blown (very expensive). These proved the best palate experience for me. The spirit flows across the tongue bringing out flavors I would miss with other glasses. The nose would probably rank 3 or 4. Because I was more of a palate than nose man, these were my favorate until getting the Whisky Magazine glasses above. I don't really care for the handfeel. The stem gets a bit in the way and they are too delicate.

4)Kusac chrystal. Very good nose, very good palate and very good handfeel. The flared lip (like the Reidel's) helps the pour and seems more comfortable for nosing too me.

5) Reidel Single Malt Glasses (machine made). Good nose, good palate, handfeel similar to handblown but at least not quite so delicate.

6) Ardbeg glasses with covers. Very good nose, good palate, good handfeel (although I'm not fond of the stem). These are fun. The cover is great for maintaining the bouquet. I do prefer chrystal to glass though.

Pardon much of this note being a cross post.
blackkeno
Bronze Member
 
Posts: 104
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2001 2:01 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Postby Veach » Mon Jul 08, 2002 11:15 pm

I use a glass that came from my days as Archivist at United Distillers at Stitzel-Weller. It is one of the glasses from the quality control lab. I decided that if this is what they were using to make decisions about their bourbon, then I should try to taste using that type of glass as well. That way I know that at least as far as the glassware is concerned, I will be smelling and tasting the same thing as the Master Distiller, Ed Foote was sensing.

Mike Veach
Veach
New member
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Louisville, Ky. USA

Postby Steve » Thu Jul 11, 2002 7:05 pm

Whilst drinking out of an overlarge brandy glass may indeed concentrate the nose and enhance the palate, I rather suspect that those advantages are outweighed considerably by the fact that you'll look like an idiot. ;-)

And although the glasses we were given at WhiskyLive were rather good, again, it's not something you could use anywhere where you might be noticed......

As someone else noted above, a nice chunkily-based but fine crystal tumbler will serve the purpose for anything other than a Jilly Goolden type session, and the fewer Jilly Gooldens the better, IMO.

Alas the desire not to be considered pretentious may lessen the taste experience for you, but at least you'll still have friends to drink with......

Cheers!
Steve
New member
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2001 2:01 am

Return to Questions & Answers

Whisky gift and present finder