Thanks for the limks v1p, maybe 1 day I make a new up-to-date average, but it is very timeconsuming
I made my list in January 2005
It can be downloaded from the danish whiskyforum whiskynyt where I posted it originally
http://www.whiskynyt.dk/index.php?name= ... oad&id=1141 column is Jim Murray's Bible
2 column is The matrix
3 column is Whisky mag recalced
4 column er M. Jacksons
5 column is the average
Most of the products are exactly the same today as back then... these standard bottlings are..standard bottlings
Some of the reviewers above have changed their ratings, matrix for sure, as its a running average allready. I have also seen whiskymag review the same whisky very different within a short time (same reviewer

)
I do belive peoples view of these products has changed more than the products themselves have
Even thou the majority (thats my believe) is unchanged, quite a lot of the malts have been relabeled and redesigned. Mainly the lower scoring ones. Most notably BenRiach imho. I know Deanston has been changed - I havent tried the new version
The top five whiskies are all very "traditional" standard bottlings in the sense they have been the same as long as I can remember
Personal I tend to agree by the general pattern shown by the scheme. I really like the top whiskies and don't like the bottom ones particulary
I used to find BenRiach pretty boring, but do like the 12y old the new owners has put out
Macdeffe