Question. With what I'm hearing about the cost of (especially) new sherry casks, I'm wondering why batches of whisky are not made with the odd port or rum cask "thrown in". I'm thinking instead of finishing runs with first-fill port (or whatever) casks, one could age 90-95% of the batch in bourbon and the rest in port casks, and then marry the two for a while. It would cut down on using new barrels for finishing and cut down on costs re: wood policy. There must be an answer why this is not done. Any ideas?
Frodo

