Not a member? - Register and login now.
All registered users can read our entire magazine archive.

Eagle Rare 101. To stock up or not to stock up

All your whisky related questions answered here.

Eagle Rare 101. To stock up or not to stock up

Postby Ed » Mon Aug 22, 2005 2:20 pm

Somebody PMed me and asked about the Eagle Rare 101 ten year old Kentucky Straight Bourbon and whether he should stock up or not. Here is my response.

"The Eagle Rare 101 is ten years old but is not a Single Barrel. The reason the 101 is not going to be marketed in the future is that they are concentrating on the Single Barrels and other expressions that use the same whiskey aged in different ways. Buffalo Trace miscalculated some ten years back on how popular their some of their bourbons were going to be and there just isn't enough to go around.

BTW, there is a 10 year old SB as well as the 17 year. There might be some in between, I am not sure. I know that the ER 10 SB is lower proof than the 101. They are 50.5% abv and 45% abv respectively. I haven't really drunk all that much ER, only enough to know that I really like it. 3 bottles of the 101 and a little more than half a bottle of the 10 year SB. Obviously I can't compare different bottlings of the SB. But the one bottle that I have had is, I think, a little better than the 101. Not enough better to make the higher price fully justified, IMHO. But who knows? I had three bottles of Elmer T Lee SB that I thought were really wonderful. I am pretty sure they were all from the same barrel though they aren't marked as to barrel. They all came from the same shelf, probably the same case and they all tasted the same. Then I got another one the other day and it was Enormously better than the others I had had. It wasn't my imagination. I had the last pour from one and right after that the first pour from the new bottle and the second one blew the doors off the earlier bottle.

To stock up or not to stock up? I have bought five 101s so far. I may buy more. That could be a mistake. Now I have less incentive to explore the SB 10. But I do have a supply of whiskey that I know I enjoy that I bought at a reasonable price."

So what do the rest of you think? Not so much about the ER 101, but stocking up on well loved whiskies that are in the process of disappearing? With ER 101 it was easy enough to set some aside as it is in the $20 -$25 range here, could be cheaper Stateside, I don't know about other markets. And what do you think of the differences between barrels? I have only had bourbon single barrels so far. I am not asking about specially selected SBs like the SMWS issues. I would expect that sort of thing to be quite distinctive. I am thinking more of OBs. Do they vary as much as Blanton's (all ranging from excellent to WOW!) and the Elmer T Lee (similar range, this bottle is something else.) that I spoke of above. Those are the only SBs that I have had the pleasure to have tasted even a small range. BTW. they are from the same distillery, Buffalo Trace, and are from the same mash bill. The Elmer T Lee is the older of the two, I think.
Ed
Ed
Silver Member
 
Posts: 408
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 3:33 pm
Location: Japan (American)

Re: Eagle Rare 101. To stock up or not to stock up

Postby Deactivated Member » Mon Aug 22, 2005 3:05 pm

Ed wrote:..."The Eagle Rare 101 is ten years old but is not a Single Barrel. The reason the 101 is not going to be marketed in the future is that they are concentrating on the Single Barrels and other expressions that use the same whiskey aged in different ways..."

Also, they have introduced -- and are slowly taking national -- their eponymous Buffalo Trace bourbon, which approximates the Eagle Rare 101 both in age and price. The two bottlings would effectively have been competing against each other.

"...BTW, there is a 10 year old SB as well as the 17 year..."

The 17yo is NOT a single-barrel bourbon, but married from hand-selected barrels, which can be precious few -- only 1,050 bottles in 2004.

..."To stock up or not to stock up? I have bought five 101s so far. I may buy more. That could be a mistake. Now I have less incentive to explore the SB 10. But I do have a supply of whiskey that I know I enjoy that I bought at a reasonable price."
So what do the rest of you think?...

If you like it, stock up. I'll pick up a few bottles of ER101, but I enjoy the newer Buffalo Trace, so they will be more collectibles than drinking bottles. The old Wild Turkey Russell's Reserve 101 proof, on the other hand, I'll seek out now that the diluted 90-proof version is appearing more places. The old version was WT's best-value bourbon. With the WT12yo disappearing, and the RR amounting to more water for the same price (the suits at Wild Turkey are doing a pretty good job of making their line a bunch of 'I-can-live-without-'em' products), the RR 101 is worth looking for.

The Elmer T Lee is the older of the two, I think.


Correct. Blanton's is around 8 years old (it varies a little -- they select to match a taste profile, not an age), while the ETL is usually around 10, though Elmer's been known to select some as old as 14-15 years for customers who buy and bottle entire barrels.
Last edited by Deactivated Member on Tue Aug 23, 2005 4:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Deactivated Member
 

Postby DaveM » Mon Aug 22, 2005 6:33 pm

Considering that Buffalo Trace is only 90 proof, I'd stock up on the ER101 if you like it!

You can always add water, but you can never take it away!

I find the ER to be slightly less sweet, slightly more "woody" than the new BT. If I could bunker some, I definitely would (hard to come by where I live). There's a trend today in lowering proof... ER101 isn't the first example of this we've seen. And I'm stocking up on the Russel's Reserve 101 as well.
DaveM
New member
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:00 pm
Location: Victoria Canada, Whistler, Maui

Postby Ed » Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:41 pm

Hello All,
The 17yo is NOT a single-barrel bourbon, but married from hand-selected barrels, which can be precious few -- only 1,050 bottles in 2004


Thanks for the correction, Tim, I didn't know that.

What does bottle of Russell's Reserve 101 cost there. It is a little too expensive (upper thirties) here to be a best value here.
Ed
Silver Member
 
Posts: 408
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 3:33 pm
Location: Japan (American)

Postby DaveM » Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:59 pm

Ed, the RR101 goes for $28 in WA state, but cheaper in the east. I was lucky enough to pick some up recently on clearout for $24.

A couple more thoughts about disappearing whiskey... Did you get a chance to pick up some WT Tribute last year (special Japanese bottle)? That's another release I wished I had bunkered more of. And have you had a chance to try and/or bunker some of the Old Rip Van Winkle 15/107? Another example of a lost brand (I prefer it to the new Pappy 15).
DaveM
New member
 
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Mar 17, 2005 8:00 pm
Location: Victoria Canada, Whistler, Maui

Postby Frodo » Tue Aug 23, 2005 2:30 am

I agree with storing up on whisky that's disappearing. I'm trying to do that with Port Ellens but they are just so expensive. As for the Eagle Rare, at the LCBO there are only single barrel versions. The ER is $60 and the Elmer T. Lee is $40 thus have different price points. If the ETL was going out of production, I'd definatly buy more - perhaps a case or so.

Frodo
Frodo
Triple Gold Member
 
Posts: 2472
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 2:22 pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Postby Ed » Tue Aug 23, 2005 5:56 am

Hello DaveM,
I have a chance to get the Tribute. It is still on the shelves, but at 8,800 yen (US$ 80 dollars but it feels like $88 to me) it is just too expensive. It may very well be worth every penny/yen but my budget will only cover so many things. Is it roughly twice as good as the 12 year old? It is a little less than twice as expensive. I plan to get a bottle before they disappear, but what with buying up AAA 10year old and ER 101 plus the bottles that I feel I must replace I haven't gotten to it yet. I need to get a Russell''s Reserve 101, too.
Ed
Ed
Silver Member
 
Posts: 408
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 3:33 pm
Location: Japan (American)

Postby Ed » Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:39 pm

Hello Frodo,

The Elmer T lee is an excellent value, isn't it?

Looks like you don't have any reason to stock up on the Eargle Rare SB. That's where the whiskey that would have been ER 101 is going.

Ed
Ed
Silver Member
 
Posts: 408
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 3:33 pm
Location: Japan (American)

Postby Elliot » Tue Aug 30, 2005 8:09 am

I picked up a Russell's Reserve 101 today for $19 US, which is only a bit more than the standard Wild Turkey 101 costs. There were four bottles left sitting in front of the the new 90 proof stock, but a number of places I've seen still have plenty of the 101 for sale. I haven't tasted it yet since I have a cold and nosing it would be pointless, but I figured that I certainly couldn't go wrong for the price given its ratings and the disappearance of its former incarnation.
Elliot
Bronze Member
 
Posts: 116
Joined: Fri May 06, 2005 5:17 am
Location: Columbus, OH, USA

Re: Eagle Rare 101. To stock up or not to stock up

Postby highwayman935 » Wed Feb 04, 2009 11:28 am

If anyone can direct me to a stor that carries Eagle Rare 101 I'd be most appreciative. My grandfather and I used to spend saturday afternoons in the winter time with Eagle 101. Unfortunately our store stopped carrying and we've not been able to get our hands on any since 2005. Thanks!
highwayman935
New member
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 11:25 am


Return to Questions & Answers

Whisky gift and present finder