irishwhiskeychaser wrote:I presume that's because it is not a big seller and not a very highly regarded blend. Basically this is trying to live off the original which has not been recreated to a high standard. Basically a bog standard cheap blend unfortunately. So if you like it you should stock up maybe but I would imagine that it will not be banished to touch just yet. Of course the fact that bushmills has changed ownership they are probably reviewing everything and how to proceed etc....
nstretton wrote:Oh, by the way, Bushmills seemed to indicate that they were reviewing their whole 'grains' buying policy - with no links with ID/Pernod now, they might source their grain whiskey supplies elsewhere, other than Middleton. That will surely affect all the Bushmills blends (the - many - buyers of 'Black Bush' beware !)
irishwhiskeychaser wrote:That's very interesting. I just read JM's rating and see that comment now. It'samazing how a notion from years ago can stay with you. I must give it ago again. And as you say it's cheap as chips which in it's self should not be taken as bad. I've had White Bushmills very recently and eventhough it's not bad just a bit too sweet for me.
And if they change their source for grain that could be very interesting
Aidan wrote:I picked up a bottle of Hewitts a few months ago for 22 euro. They can still be found. It's a real shame that they are't producing this anymore.
It was the only Midleton blend of grain and malt, I believe. Thanfully, it's still on the shelves of pubs. Tastes pretty nice too.
irishwhiskeychaser wrote:I 'll have to tell the missus that it is only available in the Distillery... an excuse to go
Aidan wrote:Adrian - tell her it's only available in the south of France!
Aidan wrote:There's a certain amount of fun involved in guessing what's in a blend, though.
An Irish blend is very different to a scottish one. Personally, I prefer the Irish, although there are some great Scottish blends.
Blend, vatting, single malt... I would like to think that I judge them all on their merits, rather than what's on the label.
irishwhiskeychaser wrote:There are always exceptions... Paddy has Bushmills Malt and Midleton Grain but again at least you know.
I've always wondered about the blend with 40 malts etc... I don't really get it. Take a blend with 80% grain + 40 malts, that does not leave them much space to express themselves
Aidan wrote:irishwhiskeychaser wrote:There are always exceptions... Paddy has Bushmills Malt and Midleton Grain but again at least you know.
I've always wondered about the blend with 40 malts etc... I don't really get it. Take a blend with 80% grain + 40 malts, that does not leave them much space to express themselves
I think the idea is that it gives the blend more consistency. If you had three whiskys in a blend, and you lost access to one, they product would be totally different.
irishwhiskeychaser wrote:There are always exceptions... Paddy has Bushmills Malt and Midleton Grain but again at least you know.
I've always wondered about the blend with 40 malts etc... I don't really get it. Take a blend with 80% grain + 40 malts, that does not leave them much space to express themselves