Badmonkey wrote:Wild Turkey Rye is damn fine whisky. I certainly enjoy drinking it as much as I do some great Highland scotches. But the styles are so different that I don't think I would compare them side by side.
bamber wrote:I think it is pretty pointless comparing malts to American whiskey. Personally I like both about the same (drinking a Van Winkle Rye as I type) but I've given up trying to convince bourbon drinkers to enjoy Scotch and vie versa. It just does my head in:
Scotch drinker on bourbon: Ooooh it's too sweet, too woody tastes like Jack Daniel's.
Bourbon drinker on Scotch: It tastes like an old ashtray, it's too harsh bla bla bla.
Not sure where that came from. I'm off to bed.
bamber wrote:I think it is pretty pointless comparing malts to American whiskey. Personally I like both about the same (drinking a Van Winkle Rye as I type) but I've given up trying to convince bourbon drinkers to enjoy Scotch and vie versa. It just does my head in:
Scotch drinker on bourbon: Ooooh it's too sweet, too woody tastes like Jack Daniel's.
Bourbon drinker on Scotch: It tastes like an old ashtray, it's too harsh bla bla bla.
Not sure where that came from. I'm off to bed.
Oh yeh - WT rye. I would say it is not as good as the 'best Highland Scotches', but it's ok. If I was going to compare it to a Scotch I'd say Ben Nevis 10yo OB in that it is pretty good and quirky, with a very distinctive taste. If you offered me a bottle of either I'd huff an puff trying to work it out.
shoganai wrote:BTW there is something about the way the initial question was posed that cracks me up every time I read it. It's like it's setting up an ad campaign or something.
IainB wrote:Well I started on Irish and I love both. And it's a good point to say the WT Rye is maybe not on a par with the best scotches. But then, as was said above, you need to compare like with like. I would put the likes of the Sazerac 18, Thomas H. Handy uncut and my most recent addition, Rittenhouse 21 on a par with similarly aged or cark strength products. Different but what you might call "parity of esteem".
dcb wrote:I went through a bottle of WT Rye 101 pretty quick a few months ago. It's rye flavor is less bold than the Sazeracs, which is sometimes what I prefer. Good stuff, I'd buy it again, especially for the under $20 price and 101 proof.
Gov wrote:dcb wrote:I went through a bottle of WT Rye 101 pretty quick a few months ago. It's rye flavor is less bold than the Sazeracs, which is sometimes what I prefer. Good stuff, I'd buy it again, especially for the under $20 price and 101 proof.
From what I can tell there is a 101 and a 101 rye. Are they both considered rye, just the other rye more rye? Did you get those ryes?
Bob O. wrote:Gov wrote:dcb wrote:I went through a bottle of WT Rye 101 pretty quick a few months ago. It's rye flavor is less bold than the Sazeracs, which is sometimes what I prefer. Good stuff, I'd buy it again, especially for the under $20 price and 101 proof.
From what I can tell there is a 101 and a 101 rye. Are they both considered rye, just the other rye more rye? Did you get those ryes?
One is a Bourbon and the other a Rye. Their Bourbon does have Rye in their mashbill.
Gov wrote: Thanks, I am clueless when it comes to kentucky whiskey. One thing I noticed is that I can only tolerate one dram of the 101. I think it is because it is very sweet and rich. It is like a dessert whiskey I guess.
suffolkwhisky wrote:Sorry to be pedantic but Wild Turkey Rye isn't up with the very best American whiskies so it cannot compare to the very best Scotches. However, it is a very pleasant drink which personally I love.