Muskrat Portage wrote:Sparky:
Welcome to the forum, needless to say you'll find a very eclectic bunch here. Knowledgeable, but eclectic, eh Bruce?
There are some individuals here who are eclectic all by themselves....
Muskrat Portage wrote:At a tasting, I drop the measure to 1 tablespoon so that after 12 samples, you are still somewhat coherent....
Muskrat
Is that how much it takes? I'll have to try it.
I had a three-ounce dram in the pub attached to my hotel here last night, of Glenlivet 12 (the entire malt selection was that and 'fiddich). I have to say, that was a nice amount for really getting to know and enjoy the whisky. Tastings are wonderful, but a bit artificial, and I'm always a bit wary of notes made in such circumstances. I know that I cannot really begin to understand a malt in such a small sample, nor can I properly taste many consecutive malts. And tasting competitions are another thing altogether--to win such, a product must stand out in some way, and I think brewers and chili chefs, for example, design their entries with that in mind. The same principle applies to some extent to whisky tastings, so that, when I see "Macaskill 42 was the consensus hit of the evening", I take it with a grain of salt. It means that Macaskill 42 was the favorite of those tasters
in that context, but that doesn't necessarily mean that it would be the favorite of any of those people in a different (particularly noncompetitive) context.
This is also one, among several, reasons that I don't even think about scoring whiskies.