I found the case in a chairty shop, bought a new foam set of inards and made some modifications so I can check my bottles into the hold in a secure manner.


martin grant wrote:Things have changed a little now Les.
Any liquids you buy after security can now be taken on board as hand luggage. This means duty free gets the thumbs up, as will a vastly overpriced bottle of water picked up at the incredibly busy and ludicrously expensive newsagent.
Just don't try and take anything else. I've lost count of the number of tubes of toothpaste I've had to throw away at security. You'd think, I'd learn, but no
les taylor wrote:martin grant wrote:Things have changed a little now Les.
Any liquids you buy after security can now be taken on board as hand luggage. This means duty free gets the thumbs up, as will a vastly overpriced bottle of water picked up at the incredibly busy and ludicrously expensive newsagent.
Just don't try and take anything else. I've lost count of the number of tubes of toothpaste I've had to throw away at security. You'd think, I'd learn, but no
Thats good news martin we are flying in october and I would hate to miss out on some airport goodies.
hpulley wrote:I just came back from a trip with a very heavy checked bag. I had declared everything luckily but having that heavy a bag does look a bit suspicious and will get attention. I just packed my bottles in my clothes, only two were without a box/tin and those I put in socks. They all made it back safe and sound.
Harry
hpulley wrote:As said above they do let you carry duty free onboard now which is fine as long as you don't need to connect (unless you are going through customs they'll likely just move your luggage to the next plane and you won't be able to pack the duty free items).
mithril wrote:hpulley wrote:As said above they do let you carry duty free onboard now which is fine as long as you don't need to connect (unless you are going through customs they'll likely just move your luggage to the next plane and you won't be able to pack the duty free items).
You do have the opportunity to repack though because the TSA now requires all travellers arriving the US to deplane, pickup their baggage, go through customs, proceed to the check counters, be re-issued their tickets and go through security again just to get to the transit lounge that they probably walked past as they got off the plane. This is even the case with people continuing on the next leg of the flight they came in on. It took 3 HOURS for us to get through this process last time we went through LAX. What a great place this brave new world of terrorism paranoia has becomeThankfully AirZealand now has Vancouver-to-Auckland direct flights so there's little need to route through the US for any travel we're likely to undertake.
bamber wrote:Lawrence you are the James Bond of whisky.
Malt-Teaser wrote:Hi Lawrence,I have exactly the same case as that, but never used it for whisky.It is an old camera case and extremely sturdy - I remember the adverts for it showing that it could withstand the weight of a small car!All I need now is to find the right size inserts and I have a perfect whisky case too.MT
vitara7 wrote:very nice lawrance. what if you buy a litre bottle though![]()
![]()
jcasazza wrote:One a trip to the Uk a couple summers ago, i had to transfer from Leeds at Heathrow for my return flight to the US. We took a bus from one terminal to another and got slightly lost following the signs to check in. well we wound up at a door, with a woman who wanted to see our passes, which i did not have. So she walked us over to the counter to get them. as I looked to my right, i saw all the wonderful metal detector/xray machines and security personnel checking baggage and mused to myself, oh, we didnt do that, they are going to make us go back out and check our bags thru the detectors.
They didnt. We got on the international flight with carryons which were never inspected or checked or xrayed or anything else.
This is why they make you do that
bamber wrote:Lawrence you are the James Bond of whisky.
mithril wrote:My point is really that the level of governmental paranoia typified by the experience I described is exactly why terrorism works in the first place. There are reasonable security measures, extraordinary security measures, and frankly ridiculous measures. What we're talking about falls under the later. The truly sad thing is that they are purely reactionary measures that do very little to improve actual security but look good from an optics perspective.
MrTattieHeid wrote:mithril wrote:My point is really that the level of governmental paranoia typified by the experience I described is exactly why terrorism works in the first place. There are reasonable security measures, extraordinary security measures, and frankly ridiculous measures. What we're talking about falls under the later. The truly sad thing is that they are purely reactionary measures that do very little to improve actual security but look good from an optics perspective.
I had three empty 20cl bottles confiscated in Amsterdam by NW (I was connecting--KLM hadn't bothered with them in Scotland).
I don't think it's government paranoia. I think it's government agencies and airlines feeling that they need to be seen to be doing something, even if it makes no sense.
MrTattieHeid wrote:In all fairness, the government's need to be seen to be doing something is fueled by the public's paranoia and demands that something be done. Which fuels what? It's a chicken-and-egg thing, I guess, but we the public ought to take responsibility for our own attitudes, and call out our governments (and our fellow citizens) for their part in the cycle of hysteria.
MrTattieHeid wrote:In all fairness, the government's need to be seen to be doing something.
vitara7 wrote:i was goign through cardiff airport last month and in my carry on luggage, i had a small tin of saving foam that they took of me, the reason was the size of the bottle, not the contents, had it been a smaller tin of shaving foam it would have bene allowed.
but heres the annoying part, went into get a sandwich and water from the newsagent thing, and there selling shaving foam in tins bigger than what i was carrying on!!!
surley whats heppening here is its creating a monopoly for them, i though such monopolys were against rules and regulations set out by law? in the end, we end up getting fleeced beacuse of some nut jobs trying to blow themselfs up....
martin grant wrote:vitara7 wrote:i was goign through cardiff airport last month and in my carry on luggage, i had a small tin of saving foam that they took of me, the reason was the size of the bottle, not the contents, had it been a smaller tin of shaving foam it would have bene allowed.
but heres the annoying part, went into get a sandwich and water from the newsagent thing, and there selling shaving foam in tins bigger than what i was carrying on!!!
surley whats heppening here is its creating a monopoly for them, i though such monopolys were against rules and regulations set out by law? in the end, we end up getting fleeced beacuse of some nut jobs trying to blow themselfs up....
I'm with you on that one v7, it's really frustrating to see in the shops what you have just had confiscated. I'm the muppet who always holds up the queue at security as his toothpaste is confiscated. It's always explained to me that yup, it looks like a tube a toothpaste / shaving foam / sun cream or aftershave, but it's open so it could be anything (and yes, I've had them all confiscated at some time). The products on sale after security have all come from a known source, are all intact and are sold by reputable (and expensive) outlets