malthead wrote:Can someone please explain to me why Auchentoshan are launching a new 1965 - 40 year old bottling? Surely if it is a new bottling from 1965 it should be at least 41 year old if not 42?
Are there other bottlings like this? Is this because they feel 40yo can command more money than a 41 or a 42 year old?
MrTattieHeid wrote:Ah, but then they'd have the entire 41st birthday market to themselves!