Whisky Magazine Issue 16
This article is 14 years old and some information provided may be time sensitive. Please check all details of events, tours, opening times and other information before travelling or making arrangements.
Copyright Whisky Magazine © 1999-2016. All rights reserved. To use or reproduce part or all of this article please contact us for details of how you can do so legally.
Marcin Miller explains the objective of the Best of the Best tasting and how the 47 whiskies were selected, categorised and scored.
The objective of the Best of the Best Tasting was to come up with a consensus of opinion. The scoring scale is based on that used in the magazine: marks are awarded out of ten and a score of five out of 10 indicates that what has been sampled is, in fact, whisky. The whiskies were selected from the 293 tasted in the first 13 issues of Whisky Magazine.
It is important to point out that this was a tasting of 8 different flights (that is to say that the whiskies were divided into categories by style and/or region) rather than a comparative tasting of 47 whiskies. What we were trying to identify were preferred whiskies in the categories rather than a top whisky overall.
Why were the whiskies split into flights? Although a comparative tasting would have given an overall winner, the decision was taken that it would be of far greater interest to offer a winner for each ‘style'. For how can you compare the peat of Islay to the heather of Speyside? How can you compare the smooth whiskeys of Ireland to full flavoured cask strength bourbons? Certainly, there are stylistic differences within the flights: Glenfarclas 30-year-old is a very different proposition from The Macallan Gran Reserva. In broad terms, however, the flights were clearly
The top whisky in a flight is simply that – the top whisky in that flight. The fact that Hibiki 21 scored more highly than
Bushmills Millennium Malt does not mean that Japanese whisky is ‘better' than Irish whiskey. Neither do...